Chin Wag At The Slaughterhouse: Interview With Castle Freeman, Jr.

Capone02 from orig askmen photo Capone02fromOrigaskmen.jpg

Castle Freeman is the award-winning author of six novels. Go With Me is based on one of the King Arthur Tales of Thomas Malory. All That I Have is about the middle-aged Sherriff of a rural Vermont town. Freeman’s novels are set in Vermont and typically focus on local lives. Most of Freeman’s writing is about life in rural New England. Castle met me at The Slaughterhouse where we talked about gun laws and the relevance of mythology.

How did Thomas Malory inspire your great novel Go With Me?CF_GoWithMe_US300x199 photo CF_GoWithMe_300x199-UScvr_zps8dced23e.jpg

I have always loved Malory’s King Arthur tales, and in particular the Tale of Sir Gareth, because it seems to me to have a humor, an irony, that the other tales lack. The similar tales of Lancelot, Gawain, Galahad, etc., etc., are mainly straightforward accounts of heroic chivalry. The knight vanquishes the bad guys and delivers the damsel from her distress: curtain falls. In Sir Gareth, the heroic knight is subject not only to the threats of the various adversaries he must overcome, but also to the scorn and abuse of the very lady he is trying to serve, who has zero gratitude for his help, zero admiration for his feats of arms on her behalf, and zero respect for what she takes to be his low birth. My project was initially to cast that witty situation into an engaging, artful story set in the present in rural New England.

Having done that, however, I found the finished product somehow thin or incomplete—hence the invention of the circle of CF_GoWithMe_UK300x199 photo CF_GoWithMe_300x199-UKcvr_zpsba1d012f.jpgmen sitting around the sawmill, drinking beer, reminiscing, and commenting on the simultaneously developing Maloryesque adventure, and on much else. They gave me a whole new dimension of my story to elaborate and exploit; indeed, the chair factory scenes wound up being closer to the feeling I wanted the whole book to have than did the original inspiration from Malory. In my experience, stories often end up being about something other than what you originally intended for them—a freedom and unpredictability that is a source of surprise and delight for me.

Vermont has the loosest gun laws in the US, yet is a state with low crime levels, it is also an agricultural state in which hunting is popular. What are your views on US gun laws as they apply to Vermont?

The bitterly vexed question of gun ownership and gun crime in the US today does not invite originality and is, in any case, far above the pay grade of a journeyman fiction writer. Nevertheless, a couple of things should be kept in mind.

Vermont is a low-crime state because it is a low-people state. (For UK comparison, our state’s total population is similar to that of Bristol.)

Vermont has loose gun laws (in fact, it has essentially none) because it is a thinly settled, rural state. The divide in the US over whether and on what terms people should own guns is a divide along an urban-rural line, rather than a divide according to section, income, education, occupation, religion, national origin, race, political culture, etc.

Partly the tradition of gun ownership, here and elsewhere, is related to hunting, which obviously implies use of and familiarity with guns. Hunting is not as prevalent in Vermont as it was a generation ago, but it is still well and widely established here; hence, so is gun ownership.

That so many law-abiding US citizens own guns is not merely a perverse American anachronism: it’s a custom that is rooted deep in US history and culture, for better and for worse, and that is (evidently) sanctioned by the US Constitution. The dilemma for thoughtful Americans is that, notwithstanding the right to bear arms, there are a hell of a lot more arms borne here than there should be for the sake of everyone’s safety. Whether that dilemma can be resolved by law or public policy is the question. Perhaps it can’t be. The guns are here, and they aren’t going to go away.

Who are your literary influences?

I am a paleo-modernist. Therefore, my hero is James Joyce. In the USA, Wm. Faulkner and his great progenitor, Mark Twain. Also the whole spectrum of the classic English poets, right from Anon. to and through Auden, Thomas, Frost—and never forgetting the King James Bible. I could go on and on. And on. It seems to me that reading and really attending to and being moved by any literary effort is, whatever else it may be, an experience, on a par with other crucial experiences in the realms of love, growth, learning, loss, struggle, etc. We are touched, and we are changed, often (mostly) in unaccountable, imperceptible ways. The ambition to serve other readers as we have been served by these authors is not the least of the reasons why we do the work in the first place, is it? (In addition to the big money, of course.)*

* Joke

Tell us about your novel All That I Have.

CF_ATIH-300x199cvr photo CF_ATIH-300x199cvr_zps1e058dcf.jpgATIH is the story of a stressful passage in the life of Lucian Wing, the middle-aged sheriff of a rural Vermont town. Wing is successful in his work because, rather than devote his energy to enforcing and imposing the strict letter of the law, he takes a softer path, using his intimate, lifelong knowledge of the people he serves to help troubles work themselves out. This approach does well enough with the locals, but as the story begins, a group of mysterious criminal Russian emigres has moved into a remote property in the sheriff’s jurisdiction and is raising hell. Sheriff Wing’s zen-like police work will hardly succeed with this crowd. How does he proceed, and what happens?

That’s the story, but more important than the story is the character of Sheriff Wing, the portrait of his community; and certain problems he has in his personal life, including a wandering wife, a self-destructive young protege, an overzealous subordinate, an obstreperous father-in-law, and a sense that the times are passing him by.

I had originally intended in this novel to explore the idea of the witless thief who steals something whose importance, and whose threat to himself, he does not understand. That story, which is still in the book, was to have been the main narrative. The sheriff was a minor character. But then I began to think of telling the story from the sheriff’s point of view, and as a first-person narrative. Right away he kind of began speaking to me, and he and his voice soon took over the book.

Once again, as in GO WITH ME, the story, given time, knows what it needs to do and where it needs to go, almost without the help of the author.

How has Vermont influenced your fiction?

Hmmm. I don’t know if it’s a matter of influence or something bigger, vaguer, and more pervasive. Does the water influence the fish? Vermont, as a setting, a landscape, a community, a place with a particular history and culture (including a particular kind of humor), is the subject of most of what I have written, fiction and nonfiction, over more than forty years. It was to try and convey the feeling of living here, and to do so without too much recourse to straight physical description, that I originally began to write short stories and sketches. That’s my ambition today, as well, or a large part of it.

Maybe I ought to add that I am not a Vermonter. I came here in my twenties. So I have an outsider’s view, and an outsider’s affection.

What do you make of the E Book revolution?

I don’t know: is it a revolution, really? You’re still reading, aren’t you, still taking in the written content in essentially the same way? It’s a revolution, all right, if you’re a traditional book publisher, but for readers, I’m not so sure. That said, I have never read an E book and, so habituated am I to conventional books, I doubt I will ever change. I doubt I will ever have to. Books are going to be around for some time to come, I expect. They aren’t going anywhere. Kind of like guns that way, right? (See above)

Graham Greene famously wrote, ‘There is a splinter of ice in the heart of a writer.’ What do you make of his observation?

It’s a clever line, but I don’t believe it. Where is the splinter of ice in the heart of Shakespeare? (I’m willing to believe there was a splinter of ice in the heart of Graham Greene.)

What advice would you give to yourself as a younger man?

It’s a bit quaint, perhaps, but there is a saying of the Stoic philosopher and Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius that has always meant a lot to me. He said, “Love the art, poor as it may be, which thou hast learned, and be content with it; and pass through the rest of life like one who has intrusted to the gods with his whole soul all that he has, making thyself neither the tyrant nor the slave of any man.”

To this I would add, concerning that poor art: have fun with it.

What are you working on at the moment?

I’m finishing a new novel, hope to be done by spring. I’m also working on stories and essays, including a short biographical essay about the 19th century American historian Francis Parkman.

How relevant do you think mythology is today both to everyday life and literature?

I think mythology is relevant to everyday life and to literature in that it is implicated in both, and in somewhat the same ways. Myth is a way humans have used to understand and be reconciled to their experience. Myth commonly achieves this in very broad and conventionalized terms. Literature (by no means confined to fiction) does the same but on the smaller, less stylized, and more documentary scale of portraying lives lived in real time. Literature is micromyth.

I find I am beginning to sound like a Big Thinker, so I will close with gratitude for my very enjoyable visit to the Slaughterhouse.

Thank you Castle for giving an eloquent and insightful interview.

CastleFreemanJr_auth img photo CastleFreeman_image001_zpsbca87c0f.jpg

Links:

‘Go With Me’ at Amazon US and UK

‘All That I Have’ at Amazon US and UK

Read about other Castle Freeman books at his website here.

CastleF_GoWithMe_Monocle photo CF_GoWithMe_Monocle_zps63746978.png

Review of ‘Go With Me’ in Monocle.com‘s Culture Briefing
Find other reviews at Mostly Fiction and on Castle Freeman Jr’s Books page

 

Posted in Author Interviews - Chin Wags | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Chin Wag At The Slaughterhouse: Interview With Luke Rhinehart

Capone02 from orig askmen photo Capone02fromOrigaskmen.jpg

Luke Rhinehart is the bestselling author of eight novels. He is most famous for The Dice Man, in which a therapist decides to live his life at the throw of the dice. It is at once a biting satire and a challenge to the concept of order. The narrative itself switches between third and first person perspectives and inhabits the sense of the irrational that is at the core of the story. Rhinehart’s career has eschewed the predictable and bravely tackled the wider body of literature beyond the formulaic. A single book by the author contains multiple genres. While the author’s career is far more expansive than the reading of a single book by him will allow, I highly recommend The Dice Man, since it occupies a unique place in fiction. Luke met me at The Slaughterhouse where we talked about the irrational and the Great American Dream.

Publishing today seems dominated by genre, while your fictions have acted as a seminal counterpoint to that tendency. To what extent do you think shifting genres, and by implication paradigms, is necessary for a novelist?

LukeR_300x198_good-dice man photo LukeR_300x198_good-the_dice_man_zpse267fe73.jpgOf course, getting away from patterns is usually a good thing, so shifting genres, like shifting roles one plays, is often rewarding. However, from the point of view of commercial success as a writer, finding a genre one is successful in and sticking with it, is the way to go. Just as all societies reward people more if they play one consistent role, so too does publishing reward the writer who sticks to one genre. If I had found it natural and enjoyable to continue writing sci-fi adventure stories like LONG VOYAGE BACK, I might have a bit more money in the bank than I do after writing in so many different styles and genres. Or if I had followed up THE DICE MAN with another comic novel about Luke or about dicing, I would have been much more “successful.”

Instead I followed up my long dark comic-philosophical novel THE DICE MAN with a short dramatic historical novel, MATARI. The second book got only praise in reviews but did not sell to the fans of THE DICE MAN. Twenty years later I wrote SEARCH FOR THE DICE MAN, a lighter comic novel about Luke’s son Larry and his dicing, and it has done quite well, although I think it nowheres near as good a novel as MATARI (republished seven years ago as WHITE WIND, BLACK RIDER).

So I don’t think shifting genres is necessary for a novelist, and may even be damaging. Most writers find a style and subject matter and genre that they’re good at and they stick with it. I admire their luck. My own personal preference among my styles is the comic-philosophical fun of THE DICE MAN and WHIM, and the lighter satirical comey of NAKED BEFORE THE WORLD and JESUS INVADES GEORGE. But I’ve happily written five other books that don’t fit into this comic genre.

Looking back on it now, after such a phenomenal success, what do you see as the reasons you took such a divergent path as a novelist?

I don’t have the faintest idea why I do things or have done things. I don’t think humans can ever really find a causal chain to explain human behavior. In THE DICE MAN I don’t have a single sentence about Luke’s father or mother, whether he has siblings, where he went to school–not a thing about his past. And I realize I did this because I don’t think any causal connections I might try to make would have any validity. I majored in, and did graduate work in psychology and it led me to conclude that almost all psychological analysis is illusion. I admire Freud for showing us that unconscious motivations are always at work, but disagree with his theories about how we can discover these unconscious motivations. My “divergent” path as a novelist is the result of . . . . . . . beats me.

Your novel The Book Of Est is a fictional account of Est training and includes mention of Carlos Castaneda’s works. How do you view the training and to what extent do you think it and Castaneda’s work represent attempts to decondition pre-existing social programming?

Well, we’re getting into the heart of things. I like to think that everything I write is an attempt to “decondition pre-existing social programming.” Although I was concerned with the commercial goals of the est program, I nevertheless felt strongly that it was a powerful deconditioning and therefore liberating program. Carlos Castanedas work, at least his two books “A Separate Reality” and “Journal to Ixtlan,” seem to me equally powerful in getting people to question some of their basic attitudes and actions.

I think we can divide books into two classes: the literature of liberation and the literature of litany. The great mass of best sellers have incorporated into them the main values of the society; they work with many people because readers feel comfortable with the assumptions of the author, which are, in fact, the assumptions of the reader and his society. When they finish such a book they feel comfortable.

Other books force readers to question their lives and the values of the main society in which they live. Such books may force readers to question their attitudes towards gays or women or America’s “greatness”, or may question more basic structures like the nature of “selfs”, how we make decisions, or the seriousness of life. Readers who read works of liberation are left uneasy or questioning or excited: other possibilities of living have been opened to them.
There can be great novels in the literature of litany and lousy novels among the literature of liberation, but the two genres should be seen as serving very different purposes.

What are you working on right now?

As I’ve moved from my seventies into my eighties my creative energy has diminished as much as my physical energy. So after three years of doing very little new original work, I am a bit surprised to find that two months ago I began writing a new novel. Ironically, it is based on a character about whom I used to make up stories to my three boys more than fifty years ago.

In style and tone the novel is closest to my novel WHIM. The leading character is a visitor from another universe, who is originally encountered by a wise old geezer rather like Grain-of-Sand in WHIM. FF (the name the geezer’s children give to the beach-ball shaped fish that their dad brings home one day) is all muscle and all brain. FF and two dozen other FFs have arrived on earth not to conquer it, but just to hang out and see what the place is like. NSA becomes suspicious when several of these strange creatures turn up and seem to have miraculous powers of movement and brains and who resist being captured and interrogated. Obviously they are up to no good and may be robots devised by the Chinese or other baddies.

This format of having someone look at our society from outside the world of that society permits me to comment on American civilization in ways I couldn’t do without such an alien being. Whim and Jesus (in my novel JESUS INVADES GEORGE) served a similar function in their stories.

I doubt that I can now write a novel anywhere near as good as WHIM, but I’m enjoying trying. Having low standards is a good way to get writing done; having high standards leads to writing blocks.

How do you view the Great American Dream?

The American dream has evolved over the last three decades into an American nightmare. Success and getting ahead have always been an important part of the American dream but today success and getting ahead are almost exclusively measured in terms of money. Our culture, media and government have all become dominated by powerful corporations and the aims and values of these corporations. By law, corporations are required to put profits for their shareholders over all other considerations, considerations like the welfare of their employees, the effects on the environment of the corporation’s activities, the effects on society in general of their activities. Success is defined exclusively by monetary considerations. And it is these values that the corporate media spreads into our TV sets, computers, schools and households.

Most of the current sicknesses of our society–healthcare, the breakdown of the family, the gross inequalities of wealth and opportunity, the obscene waste, inefficiency, and immorality of our “defense” and spying apparatus–can be attributed directly to this perversion of the American dream to focus exclusively on monetary success. Our health-care system, the most wasteful, corrupt, and inefficient in history, is the most blatant example of a system that in our country, unlike most all other developed nations, is run by businesses for profit and, as a result, is a catastrophic failure. Since the Obamacare continues the reliance on the profit motive in much of its structure it will continue the catastrophe. Think what a different healthcare system might develop if all hospitals were non-profit, with limits on executive compensation, limits on specialists reimbursement, limits on how much a drug might be marked up from its cost. But any limitation on compensation for anyone at anytime goes against the “American dream” of letting everyone get as rich as he or she can.

The American dream used to include concerns for community, the environment, the family, the nation in general. No more. Now it is all about money. And the whole world is suffering as a result.

The Dice Man is your most famous novel. How do you view its success today and to what extent do you think we are governed by the irrational?

The success today of THE DICE MAN is really rather remarkable. It is very rare for a novel to become much more successful 30 years after its initial publication and then hold onto this resurrected success for more than a decade. The book was published in only seven or eight languages back in the early seventies and soon went out of print in all those nations except the UK, Denmark, and Sweden, where it has remained in print now for 43 years. Then, beginning in the early twenty-first century the novel began to be republished by these initial countries and be published for the first time in dozens of other countries . Today the book has been translated into 25 languages and remains in print most everywhere. Late in the first decade of this century the book was selling more copies around the world than at any time ever.

THE DICE MAN has never been a bestseller. It is a cult book, attracting a few very enthusiastic readers, but never appealing to a mass audience. I like it that way.

And as an interesting sidenote, two others of my books which were each published more than 30 years ago have also found an audience as great as upon initial publichation. Three years ago I and two friends republished THE BOOK OF EST as an eBook and paperback. Initially published in 1976 and long out of print, the book has been a very profitable seller now for almost three years. And two years ago Permuted Press republished LONG VOYAGE BACK (first published in1983) as an eBook. For almost six months it was their single most successful eBook. I have no explanation for these late successes of these three of my books.

My guess is that we are pretty much governed totally by the irrational. The human being is so complex, has so many independent variables acting on him or her at any moment, that “reason” will always remain a very minor player in the big league of human behavior. Assuming there is such a thing as reason I feel that even when I behave “rationally,” with purpose and intelligence, I am still governed by the irrational. Sometimes (rather rarely in my case) the multiple irrational forces move me to act in a way that others label rational, and at others in a way that others label foolish or irrational. Although I believe we can never have any certainty about why we do things, I certainly have never found any evidence that human beings are governed by the rational. We may do many clever or reasonable things, but if we think it’s because we are “rational” I think we are sadly mistaken.

Tell us about White Wind, Black Rider.

LukeR_300x198_WWBR photo LukeR_300x198_white-wind-black-rider_zps7f08311f.jpgWHITE WIND, BLACK RIDER was the first novel I published after THE DICE MAN. I wrote it under the influence of Kurosawa’s magnificent film THE SEVEN SAMURAI, Joseph Conrad’s way of telling stories, and the tragedies of Shakespeare. I was consciously writing a tragedy: a story of a good man, Lord Arishi, brought to a tragic end despite his good qualities and the noble qualities of his wife Matari, who has fled his confining court, and the noble qualities of Oboko and Izzi, the two samurai who rescue her in a blizzard and then try to save her from the vengeance of Lord Arishi. Four good people, all acting for good and noble purposes, nevertheless reach a tragic end.

The book was published in the UK in 1975 as MATARI. All of the reviews it received were rave reviews, but the book sold few copies. Although Pocket Book paid me a modest advance to publish a paperback of the book in the U.S., their enthusiasm evaporated and they never published the book. In 1977 Andrew LLoyd Webber’s people approached me about turning it into an opera, but nothing came of it.

I talked earlier about genre and the commercial desirability of sticking with one genre and writing in one of the major genres. WHITE WIND, BLACK RIDER is a tragedy, and although there are sword fights and chases, the book is driven by the relations between the characters, the story of four good people caught in tragic conflict. There is no genre of “tragedies.”

I have published the book myself both as a paperback and an eBook and hope I can draw readers to read it since it is the sort of book that if you read the first 30 pages you’re hooked. Tough, though, to get people to read the first 30 pages.

What do you make of The E Book revolution?

I think the eBook revolution is a great gift to writers. An author can now get his book out into the world for a huge audience for a few hundred dollars. He may not make a lot of money from eBook sales, but his royalty percentage is five to ten times more than what he gets from traditional publishers.

For readers too the eBook is a gift. One can now read and own bestsellers for much less than in print form and buy fine books by lesser-known authors that previously might not even be available–and for half perhaps of a paperback price.

The eBook and print-on-demand publishing make it possible for an author to become his own publisher. He can thus receive royalties of fifty percent or more rather than the ten percent or so from traditional publishers. I recently turned down a publisher’s offer to publish my novels SEARCH FOR THE DICE MAN and WHIM for the first time here in the U.S. I concluded that I wanted to publish the books myself as print-on-demand and eBooks and enjoy the control and high royalty structure that such self-publication permits.

What advice would you give to yourself as a young man?

None. I would give myself no advice to the person I was then. As a young man I was stupid, arrogant, uninformed, unread, immature, egotistical without any justification, and generally a person I blush at when I remember him. Still, I give him no advice. He was what he was and I am what I am. We are both fools, and I see no justification in letting the fool I am today make judgments on the fool I was back then. Much more importantly, I am satisfied with my life and thus would not want the person I was as a young man to be any different than he was since a different him then would mean a different me now.

No regrets. If one embraces the present as I do, one can’t lament anything that happened in the past. One can know one was stupid or cruel or selfish, but wishing one could change things is a waste of effort. It was Nietzsche who in his idea of the eternal recurrence suggested that the healthy man would be happy if he lived the same life over and over through all eternity. I personally might prefer a “spring break” now and then, but his idea is that if we embrace now then we embrace everything that has ever happened. Yes.

Do you think that the self exists?

The ‘self’ is a construct that is more dangerous than useful. I often have a feeling of my ‘self’, and it is pleasant enough. However, always such a feeling separates me from other human beings and from the rest of the universe. I think most human beings’ happiest and most creative moments occur when their feeling of self disappears. Any athlete or writer competing at full throttle loses all sense of self. When he starts imagining his gold trophy or his royalties, he ceases to write.

I have concluded that a human being cannot be separated from the reality that is all around him and in him and is him. There is the cliche question: am I playing with the dog or is the dog playing with me? I think this question could be applied to everything that happens: is the individual ‘doing’ things to the world or is the world doing things to him? One of the most comforting phrases I know comes from a South American shaman: “N’gyam.” It means “nobody home.” There is no central self, there is no soul, there is no “me”. Nobody home. If the Buddha taught anything, he taught work until the self, mara, disappears. He sometimes seems to say that when the little self is gone then the Self arises, but what he means is that when the little self is gone, then all that is left is the All: Buddha’s Self includes the entire universe.

So let’s throw out the concept of self and try to live with a sense not of self, but of flow, emptiness, the interaction of all with all. It’s a nice way to be.

Luke thank you for a great and informative interview.

LukeR_300x274 photo LukeR_luke_rhinehart_zps90f497bf.jpgLinks:

The Dice Man
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Lukerhinehart.com
White Wind, Black Rider
Amazon.com, kindle
Amazon.co.uk, kindle
Lukerhinehart.com, paperback

See the Shop at lukerhinehart.com for all Luke’s books

Posted in Author Interviews - Chin Wags | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

Chin Wag At The Slaugherhouse: Interview With David Mark

Capone02 from orig askmen photo Capone02fromOrigaskmen.jpg

David Mark worked as a journalist before becoming a novelist. He spent many years as crime reporter with The Yorkshire Post. His writing is influenced by the court cases he covered. Dark Winter was his first novel. And he has a new one out, Original Skin, published by Quercus. In it, Detective Sergeant Aector McAvoy makes his second appearance. David met me at The Slaughterhouse where we talked about his new release and the importance of Hull in his fictions.

Tell us about Original Skin.

DMark_300x427_OrigSkin photo DMark_427x300_OrigSkin_zps546aa9c0.jpgIn essence, it’s a police procedural and a serial killer story but I hope there’s more to it than that. It’s the second outing for Detective Sergeant Aector McAvoy; the shy colossus of Dark Winter. He’s a member of Humberside Police’s Serious and Organised unit, though his part in the downfall of a corrupt but popular officer means that he very much a marked man. In Original Skin, McAvoy comes into possession of an old mobile phone that contains the phone number of a young man who killed himself months before. As he delves deeper into the life of the dead man, McAvoy finds connections between the suicide victim and key decision-makers on the Police Authority and city council. Was it suicide? And is there a link to the sudden escalation in violent crime linked to the drugs trade within the Hull city boundary? McAvoy and the unit’s boss, Trish Pharaoh, are unsure. McAvoy also begins to see a common thread in several seemingly unconnected crimes – all of which seem to point to one dangerous and deadly foe. Somebody is targetting pleasure-seekers. They are searching out the ‘swingers’ willing to leave their doors unlatched and themselves exposed and who are blind to the risks as they seek to satisfy their own needs and the pleasures of strangers. McAvoy must risk his career to save the lives of hedonists whose lifestyle he cannot understand, in a case that could shatter the tranquil life he has built at home.

Do you think that the best detectives have strong criminal shadows?

I think it would be naive to suggest that good detectives need to have criminal impulses. I would hate to imagine that all quality murder detectives were secretly high functioning sociopaths who are secretly battling inner demons. Crime fiction is littered with these types of caricatures, and I love reading about them, but what i try and create in the McAvoy books is a feeling of authenticity. The crimes may be remarkable but I like to imagine that it wouldn’t seem incomprehensible to read about them in the newspapers in the real world. To that end, I try and make McAvoy a believable human being. He’s imbued with the characteristics I admire and which I would hope to find in a real life murder detective. He’s committed, dogged, tenacious and, because he’s like the rest of us, absolutely riddled with self-doubt. He loves his family, doesn’t know if he’s actually any good at what he does, gets himself intro trouble by accident, but tries to ensure that anybody who suffers, gets some measure of justice. He’s basically a good egg who gets dragged into worlds and situations he doesn’t understand. But by the same token, he does, like we all do, understand the compulsion to kill. He just hasn’t given in to it and believes that those who do have somehow let the species down a little. It would be lovely to kill the people who wrong us. But the planet would be empty in a week.

How important is Hull as a location for your fiction?

It’s crucial. It’s really the central character. I admire the novelists who can create a Jack Reacher or a Dirk Pitt or even a Hercule Poirot character who can have tremendous adventures regardless of location but those aren’t the books I feel I could write, which is probably why I’m quite a few quid behind their creators! I have to understand a place before I’m qualified to
turn it into fiction. Hull is the place where I was a journalist for what felt like a very long time, and I understand how the people interact and talk to each other and how certain people on certain streets feel an instant distrust for people on other streets because of some trawling dispute going back 60 years or because they support Kingston Rovers instead of Hull FC. I
could probably acquaint myself with that kind of knowledge about other cities but it just wouldn’t feel comfortable for me. I like the idea of the old Westerns where you have a sheriff keeping a small town safe from trouble. That’s how I see Rebus and Grace, Alan Banks, Frank Elder and Benedict Devlin. Their role is to keep their part of the world safe. For McAvoy, it’s Hull. My only fear is running out of geographically or architecturally interesting settings by later in the series. I guess it’s just a city that speaks to my imagination. Every scene or scenario I can come up with, I can picture happening somewhere in the city. Every new character I create, I put through the filter of whether or not I can picture them having a drink in one of the pubs in the Old Town, and if I can, then that makes them believable and worth writing about. I did read somewhere that the photographer Ansell Adams only knew how to find equivalent scenes for the images in his mind when he was in the landscapes of his youth. When he tried to photograph abroad he felt his images were insipid and contrived. That’s how I feel when I write about somewhere that isn’t Hull. I know this city. I know how it feels. I know it well enough to pick handfuls of it up and throw it at a page and see what sticks. I don’t feel that way about anywhere else.

Are there any particular authors you admire and if so why?

I admire anybody who can call themselves an author in the traditional sense, in that they are given a sum of money by a publisher in order to see their name on a book in a bookshop or library. That is no small achievement! The amount of obstacles one must overcome and the sheer serendipity required to make it happen, sometimes makes it feel nothing short of a miracle to walk into WH Smith’s and see a book you have written staring back at you. People tempted to self-publish on Amazon should only do so after they have utterly exhausted every avenue of living their dream the old-fashioned way – there really is no sensation quite like it. But of those who do make it to the party, there are some whose skills and insights and sheer brilliant leave me both inspired and depressed – and full of self-loathing at not being as good as they are! in the literary world, people like Sebastian Faulks, Pat Barker and Hilary Mantel and Margaret Atwood leave me thoroughly green with envy at their mastery of language and depiction of the human condition. When it comes to tales of swashbuckling chivalry I am a Bernard Cornwell devotee. For satire and fantasy, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman are the first names I search for. But when it comes to crime, the list is endless. Ian Rankin, for the consistent quality and reliability of the work. Reginald Hill and Colin Dexter, for their ability to use language beautifully while telling a damn good yarn. I like the plot structures of Mark Billingham, Mari Hannah and Val McDermid and the atmosphere created by Stav Sherez, Peter May and Steve Mosby. I admire the imagination and scope of Lauren Beukes. Neil Cross is damnably good at everything! Looking at that lot, it’s amazing I dare call myself a writer, really. I’m humbled just to have the same job title as these people.

Graham Greene wrote, ‘There is a splinter of ice on the heart of a writer.’ What do you make of his observation?

It’s a very poetic way of saying that writers (and most artistic types) can be proper grumpy and cynical bastards, but because we have a way with words, we dress it up a little. He’s right though. You have to have something to say before you write a book and that does tend to come from some dissatisfaction with the world or one’s place in it. I think of the place where my creativity comes from as being a tar pit or an inkwell – all full of bile and rage and awareness of how horrible the world can be. But I only tend to channel that when I’m writing or thinking about writing. You can’t live your life that way. My kids don’t want to go on long journeys where I spend the whole time discussing man’s inhumanity or despairing over my inability to solve life’s riddles. They’d rather I made them laugh and then stopped for doughnuts. I think that without the support of my family the inkwell would be my guiding force and I’d treat myself very badly and write the gloomiest and most brutal books imaginable, but i have people who shoot some spears of light through the cloud and somehow i find a way to live in a state of relative balance, though they will probably laugh at me and disagree heartily upon reading that.

What do you make of the E Book revolution?

Evolution is a human compulsion. Everything moves forward. It’s the same with stories. They’ve moved from the campfire to the cave wall, then to to papyrus and parchment. I don’t know anybody who still reads on scrolls but I’m sure when the first book came out people were moaning that scrolls were always good enough for them. I have no problem with people finding new ways to ingest stories. What I do take issue with is the fact that some of the charm seems to be leaving the book world. In the same way that nobody can say in good conscience that they get the same thrill downloading an mp3 from iTunes as they do browsing the vinyl in a record shop, I do hate the idea of people not going into bookshops any more. Nobody can argue with the fact that ebooks are helping more people to think of reading as a major part of their life. I love my Kindle. I love being able to hear about a book one minute and be reading it the next. My gripe is with the lack of quality control in eboks. I’m a great believe that every book on Amazon should have either a ‘sp’ or ‘pp’ sticker beside it. self-published or properly published. I say that because it took me bloody years to get properly published and I had to work and work and work to get here and now people can say they are a top ten bestseller because they’ve stuck out some thriller at 20p and a load of people have snapped it up. Does it mean it’s any good? Has anybody got past the second page? I just get narked at authors being devalued and casual readers being encouraged to buy something because it’s cheap, rather than a properly put together and competently edited professional work.

How have you found Quercus as a publisher?

When Dark Winter was up for grabs I found myself in the surreal and wonderful position of having to choose between several competing publishers who all seemed very keen on making the McAvoy series a big success. Quercus wasn’t the biggest name but they did offer something that nobody else did, and that was editor Jon Riley. Jon seemed to understand instinctively what I
was trying to achieve and has become a true friend and significant person in my life. For that reason alone I’m delighted to have chosen Quercus. Of course there are times when I’m petulant and precious and kicking up a fuss at home because they haven’t spent a million pound advertising the latest McAvoy book on billboards in Leicester Square but that’s just because I’m a novelist and we can all be a bit of a twat sometimes. But, yeah, Quercus and me seem to work pretty well together. The sales team are really enthusiastic and I love all of the artwork that the art department has put together. Visually, the hardbacks are superb and the look of the paperback for Dark Winter was instrumental in its success. Quercus, I’m really rather fond of you. Not so much the accounts department, but me and numbers people don’t get on ….

What are you working on at the moment?

I sometimes feel like I have insufficient arms for all the things I have on the go at once. If I was Dr Octopus I’d be able to type all the different things I have in my head. As it is, I have to go for discipline instead. I’ve just put the finishing touches to a historical novel set in hull during the cholera epidemic that killed thousands of people in 1849. It introduces a new character by the name of Meshach Stone; a fallen hero and lone survivor of the massacre on the road from Kabul. he is now serving as bodyguard and guide to a young Canadian Archaeologist on a quest to discover religious relics. That search leads them to a country house in Yorkshire, where the brutal murder of a young girl leads the drunken, laudanum-addled Meshach into an investigation which threatens his sanity, his life and his soul. It could be the best thing I’ve ever written or it could be a pile of tosh. I’ll let you know when my editor has seen it. Aside from that I’ve got the edits to do on the fourth McAvoy book, Taking Pity, and a compendium of children’s stories for ‘children who are happy to be bonkers’. I’m not sure if anything will ever come of that but my nine-year-old daughter insists I do it, and she’s the boss. Then there’s a full-length children’s novel which has been in my head for years and features a family battling evil creatures underground in Andalucia. It’s a good job I’m a full-time writer these days. Work really used to get in the way!

What else is on the cards for you this year?

It’s always difficult to predict the future but a lot of things are in the “could happen and could be amazing” bracket. A major TV company has bought Dark Winter so with luck that will take off, and on the book front it’ non-stop. The third McAvoy book is out in the Spring and I’m hopeful that the historical novel isn’t left languishing for too long as I’d like to see it out sooner rather than later. I’ve sold books into several different territories so they all come out at different stages. In a couple of months I’m in Amsterdam chatting to Dutch journalists about the first McAvoy book but by the end of the year we’ll be talking up the fourth one in the UK. Throw in Germany, Spain, Italy, Russia and Turkey and it’s hard to keep your brain in the right book. The Americans are keeping pace with the British releases and I hope my publishers there maintain their faith in the series. I’m also on the organising committee for the Theakston’s Old Peculier Crime Writing Festival at Harrogate, which means I spend a lot of time with my heroes, which is surreal and wonderful. Really, my year is just writing and talking about it, and being a dad the rest of the time.

Give us a snapshot of the life of a writer. What are you doing right now?

I’m in my office, which is currently littered with wrestling figures because my daughter has been in and sitting in front of the electric fire, which I insist on having in my room because the big old parsonage where we live is bloody freezing and I’m the only one here during the day. My son is downstairs practising a Ray Charles song for a gig tonight at our local. I think my partner is doing something complex with a chicken. In a minute I will retreat to my battered armchair and read through some editorial questions on Taking Pity, then I will have a small rant about pedantic bastards before realising they are right, and addressing their questions. The evening will involve whisky and I will probably begin watching an uplifting documentary on Sky Arts, then get bored and switch over to an old episode of QI. My life is so frightfully middle class these days I feel an urge to go out and smash a bus shelter just to re-connect with my roots.

Thank you David for an eloquent and observant interview.

DMark_300x400_auth-img photo DMark_300x400_P10196032_zpsecad5c57.jpgLinks:

You can get a copy of ‘Original Skin’ from these sources:
     Quercus, the publisher
     Amazon UK in Kindle, Paperback, Hardcover, and Audiobook formats
     Amazon US in Kindle, Paperback, Hardcover, and Audiobook formats
     Barnes & Noble in Nook/ePub and Hardcover formats

Other books by David Mark published by Quercus

Find David Mark on his website and Twitter @davidmarkwriter

Posted in Author Interviews - Chin Wags | 2 Comments